[1]曹 蕾,李小月,罗庆礼,等.CIM，mCIM 和MHT 筛选肠杆菌科细菌产碳青霉烯酶的方法评价[J].现代检验医学杂志,2020,35(01):67-70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2020.01.018]
　CAO Lei,LI Xiao-yue,LUO Qing-li,et al.Evaluation of CIM, mCIM and MHT Screening Methods for Carbapenem- producing Enterobac Teriaceae[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2020,35(01):67-70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2020.01.018]
点击复制

CIM，mCIM 和MHT 筛选肠杆菌科细菌产碳青霉烯酶的方法评价()
分享到：

《现代检验医学杂志》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
第35卷
期数:
2020年01期
页码:
67-70
栏目:
论　　著
出版日期:
2020-02-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation of CIM, mCIM and MHT Screening Methods for Carbapenem- producing Enterobac Teriaceae
文章编号:
1671-7414(2020)01-067-04
作者:
曹 蕾1; 李小月1; 罗庆礼2; 王亚平1
(1.安庆市第一人民医院检验科,安徽安庆 246003; 2.安徽医科大学病原生物学教研室,合肥 230000)
Author(s):
CAO Lei1; LI Xiao-yue1; LUO Qing-li2;  WANG Ya-ping1
(1.Department of Medical Laboratory,the First People's Hospital of Anqing, Anhui Anqing 246003, China; 2.Department of Pathogenic Biology, Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230000, China)
关键词:
肠杆菌;  碳青霉烯酶;  碳青霉烯类抑制试验;  改良碳青霉烯类失活试验;  改良Hodge试验
分类号:
R378.2; R446.5
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2020.01.018
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 评估碳青霉烯类抑制法(carbapenem inactivation method,CIM)、改良碳青霉烯类失活法(modified carbapenem inactivation method,mCIM)和改良Hodge试验(modified hodge test, MHT )对肠杆菌科细菌碳青霉烯酶表型筛选能力。方法 以PCR检测碳青霉烯酶基因作为金标准,对120株耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌(carbapenem-resistant enterbacteriaceae,CRE)和50株碳青酶烯类敏感的肠杆菌科细菌,分别进行CIM,mCIM和MHT表型筛选试验,评估三种方法的表型筛选能力。结果 120株CRE中,93株携带碳青霉烯酶耐药基因,表型筛选试验显示,CIM,mCIM和MHT的敏感度分别是95.6%,96.8%和95.8%,特异度分别为72.7%,92.3%和50%。三种方法筛选碳青霉烯酶,差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.796,P<0.05)。与PCR结果相比较,CIM,MHT和mCIM的一致率分别为90%,95%和77.4%,Kappa值分别为0.898,0.949和0.771。mCIM和CIM试验与PCR高度一致。50株碳青酶烯类敏感的肠杆菌科细菌PCR检测和三种方法均为阴性。结论 三种表型筛选方法均有较高的敏感度,但mCIM较CIM,MHT具有更高的特异度和一致率,是筛选CRE的有效方法。
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the screening ability of carbapenem inactivation method(CIM), modified carbapenem inactivation method(mCIM)and modified Hodge test(MHT)for carbapenem enzyme phenotype of Enterobacteriaceae bacteria. Methods PCR method was used to detect the genes of carbapenemase in Enterobacteriaceae bacteria,and the results were utilized as the standard of the phenotype screening capacity of CIM, mCIM and MHT test for 120 isolates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and 50 sensitive strains.Results Among 120 CRE strains, 93 strains carried carbapenemase resistance genes. Phenotypic screening tests showed that the sensitivity of CIM, mCIM and MTH were 95.6%,96.8% and 95.8%,respectively. The specificity of the three phenotypic screening methods was 72.7%,92.3% and 50%, respectively. There were significant differences among the three methods(χ2 = 12.796, P< 0.05). Compared with PCR,the consistency rates of the three methods were 90%,95% and 77.5%,and the Kappa values of the three methods were 0.898,0.949 and 0.771,respectively.50 strains of carbapenem-sensitive Enterobacteriaceae bacteria were detected by PCR and all three methods were negative. Conclusion All three phenotypic screening methods had high sensitivity, but mCIM had higher specificity and consistency than CIM and MHT. mCIM is an effective method for screening CRE.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张艳双,刘静,万楠,等. 耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科(CRE)耐药分子机制及控制流行的应对策略[J].现代检验医学杂志,2019, 34(2): 1-4. ZHANG Yanshuang,LIU Jing,WAN Nan, et al.Molecular mechanism of carbapenem-resistant Entero-Bacteriaceae(CRE)resistance and coping strategies for controlling epidemics[J].J Mod Lab Med,2019,34(2):1-4.
[2] TAMMA P D, GOODMAN K E, HARRIS A D, et al. Comparing the outcomes of patients with carbapenemase-producing and non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resietant Enterobacter-iaceae Bacteremia[J]. Clin Infect Dis. 2017, 64(3):257-264.
[3] VAN DER ZWALUW K, DE HAAN A, PLUISTER G N, et al. The carbapenem inactivation method(CIM), a simple and low-cost alternative for the Carba NP test to assess phenotypic carbapenemase activity in gram-negative rods[J]. PLOS One, 2015, 10(3): e0123690.
[4] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing:twenty-seventh informational supplement.[S]. Wayne:PA, CLSI M100-S27, 2015.
[5] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing:twenty-second informational supplement[S]. Mayne: PA,CLSI M100-S22, 2012.
[6] MLYNARCIK P, RODEROVA M, KOLAR M. Primer evaluation for PCR and its application for detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae[J]. Jundishapur J Microbiol,2016,9(1): e29314.
[7] PIERCE V M, SIMNER PJ, LONSWAY D R, et al. Modified carbapenem inactivation method for phenotypic detection of carbapenemase production among Enterbacteriaceae[J]. J Clin Microbiol.2017, 55(8): 2321–2333.
[8] 朱明辉,马红映,王卫华,等.耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌耐药性及碳青霉烯类失活法检测分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志.2019,29(3):330-334. ZHU Minghui,MA Hongying,WANG Weihua, et al.Drug resistance and carbapenem inactivation method test analysis of carbapenem-rsistant Klebsiella pneumoniae[J].Chin J Nosocomiol,2019,29(3):330-334.
[9] BERESFORD RW, MALEY M. Reduced incubation time of the modified carbapenem inactivation test and performance of carbapenem inactivation in a set of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae with a high proportion of blaIMP isolates[J]. J Clin Microbiol,2019, 57(7). pii: e01852-18.
[10] 张凡,李耘,甘 露. 改良碳青霉烯灭活试验在检测肺炎克雷伯菌碳青霉烯酶中的应用评价[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志.2018,34(24):2857-2860 ZHANG Fan,LI Yun, GAN Lu. Evaluation of the modified carbapenem inactivation method for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae[J].Chin J Clin Pharmacol,2018,34(24):2857-2860.
[11] TAMMA P D, SIMNER P J. Phenotypic detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms from clinical isolates[J]. J Clin Microbiol. 2018,56(11):e01140-18.
[12] CROWE A,BRENTON L, KINGSTON M,et al. Comparison of the carbapenem inactivation method(CIM)and modified carbapenem inactivation method(mCIM)for the detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms[J]. Pathology, 2018, 50(7):764-766.
[13] 马红玲,肖圣达,杜帅先,等.碳青霉烯酶3种检测方法间的比较[J].临床血液学杂志.2018,31(2):105-107. MA Hongling, XIAO Shengda,DU Shuaixian,et al.Comparison of three test methods detecting carbapenemases[J].J Clin Hematol China, 2018,31(2):105-107.
[14] TAMMA P D, OPENE B N, GLUCK A, et al. Comparison of 11 phenotypic assays for accurate detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae[J]. J Clin Microbiol. 2017,55(4):1046-1055.
[15] VASOO S, CUNNINGHAM S A, KOHNER P C, et al. Comparison of a novel,rapid chromogenic biochemical assay,the Carba NP test,with the modified Hodge test for detection of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacilli[J]. J Clin Microbiol,2013,51(9): 3097-3101.
[16] SNN kunling, XU Xiuyu, YAN Jinrong, et al.Evaluation of six phenotypic methods for the detection of carbapenemases in gram-negative bacteria with characterized resistance mechanisms[J]. Ann Lab Med,2017,37(4): 305-312.
[17] GIRLICH D, POIREL L, NORDMANN R. Value of the modified hodge test for detection of emerging carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae[J]. J Clin Microbiol,2012,50(2): 477-479.

相似文献/References:

[1]王 欣,任超杰,扈会整,等.黏质沙雷菌的耐药率分析及碳青霉烯酶的检测[J].现代检验医学杂志,2015,30(01):118.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.01.034]
　WANG Xin,REN Chao-jie,HU Hui-zheng,et al.Detection of Drug Resistance of Serratia Marcescens Rate Analysis and Carbapenemase[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2015,30(01):118.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.01.034]
[2]陆丹倩,芮勇宇,杨秋,等.耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌基因检测及同源性分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2016,31(06):62.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2016.06.017]
　LU Dan-qian,RUI Yong-yu,YANG Qiu,et al.Gene Detection and Homology Analysis of Acinetobacter-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2016,31(01):62.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2016.06.017]
[3]王 颖,陈芳芳,黄 梅,等.VITEK 2 Compact专家系统对肠杆菌科碳青霉烯酶耐药表型分析的问题探讨[J].现代检验医学杂志,2017,32(04):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2017.04.028]
　WANG Ying,CHEN Fang-fang,HUANG Mei,et al.Discussion on the Problems of Vitek 2 Compact Advanced Expert System to Identify Carbapenemase Phenotypes in Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2017,32(01):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2017.04.028]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:安徽省科技厅项目(项目编号:1704f0804035)。 作者简介:曹蕾(1983-),女,硕士研究生,主管检验师,主要从事微生物耐药、免疫相关检测,E-mail:283275191qq.com。 通讯作者:李小月,副主任检验师,E-mail:18496701@qq.com。 收稿日期:2019-08-27 修稿日期:2019-10-08
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-30