[1]彭振亚,张银辉,陈安宁,等.变性梅毒重组抗原免疫印迹技术的建立及其在鉴别梅毒血清学假阳性实验的应用[J].现代检验医学杂志,2023,38(02):150-154.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2023.02.028 ]
　PENG Zhen-ya,ZHANG Yin-hui,CHENan-ning,et al.Build of Immunoblotting Technique Using Denatured Recombinant Antigen of T. pallidum and Application to Identify False Positive Serum Test Results of Syphilis[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2023,38(02):150-154.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2023.02.028 ]
点击复制

变性梅毒重组抗原免疫印迹技术的建立及其在鉴别梅毒血清学假阳性实验的应用()
分享到：

《现代检验医学杂志》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
第38卷
期数:
2023年02期
页码:
150-154
栏目:
研究简报?实验技术
出版日期:
2023-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Build of Immunoblotting Technique Using Denatured Recombinant Antigen of T. pallidum and Application to Identify False Positive Serum Test Results of Syphilis
文章编号:
1671-7414（2023）02-150-05
作者:
彭振亚; 张银辉; 陈安宁; 肖桂初; 靳 晶; 邹 钢; 陆学东
（中山大学附属第八医院，广东深圳 518033）
Author(s):
PENG Zhen-ya;  ZHANG Yin-hui;  CHENan-ning;  XIAO Gui-chu;  JIN Jing;  ZOU Gang;  LU Xue-dong
（the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Shenzhen 518033, China）
关键词:
梅毒; 梅毒螺旋体; 重组抗原; 免疫印迹技术; 生物学假阳性
分类号:
R759.1；R392.11
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2023.02.028
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 为了评估临床梅毒抗体筛查中出现假阳性实验结果的真实性，建立了变性梅毒重组抗原免疫印迹技术，并应用于对临床非高危人群梅毒抗体筛查阳性血清进行验证确认，分析出现假阳性的可能性。方法 采用梅毒 TP47， TP45，TP17和 TP15重组抗原，将变性后的抗原与非变性的抗原配对包被在硝酸纤维膜载体上，建立梅毒免疫印迹抗体谱检测方法。收集临床经电化学发光免疫分析仪及配套试剂检测的梅毒螺旋体抗体假阳性的非性病高危人群门诊和住院患者血清样本 56例、临床确认梅毒患者血清样本 25例和健康体检人员样本 30例进行方法学验证。并用该方法对 1例特殊的“梅毒患者”进行了鉴别。结果 根据建立的变性与非变性抗原配对梅毒免疫印迹抗体谱检测结果判定模式，56例临床梅毒螺旋体抗体筛查假阳性样本，对四种变性重组抗原均不发生反应，无阳性条带。但是对二种以上非变性抗原发生弱阳性反应，出现阳性条带； 25例梅毒患者对照样本，对四种非变性和变性重组抗原均有反应，出现强阳性条带； 30例健康体检人员样本，对四种非变性和变性重组抗原均无反应。梅毒螺旋体特异性抗体阳性特殊“梅毒患者”血清样本，对四种变性重组抗原均为阴性反应，但对四种非变性重组抗原出现阳性反应。患者样本经血清免疫固定电泳分析，结合临床资料诊断为 IgG λ型单克隆免疫球蛋白血症。结论 变性梅毒重组抗原免疫印迹抗体谱检测，可有效鉴别临床梅毒抗体假阳性样本。但是，对于梅毒患者的确认一定要将检验结果结合患者的流行病学史、临床表现等进行诊断。
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the correctness of the false-positive results of the clinical syphilis serum screening test, the denatured recombinant antigen of T. pallidum（TP）immunoblotting technique was established and it was applied to verify the positive results of the treponemal antibody screening test in the clinical non-highrisk population and analyze the likelihood of false positives. Methods The recombinant antigens TP47, TP45, TP17 and TP15 of T. pallidum were used, and the denatured antigens and non-denatured antigens were paired and coated on nitrocellulose membrane (NC). The immunoblotting antibody spectrum detection method for syphilis was established. 56 cases of false positive samples for T. pallidum antibody detected by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and supporting reagents from outpatient and inpatient patients with clinical non-sexually transmitted diseases , 25 samples of confirmed syphilis patients and 30 samples of healthy physical examinees were collected for methodological verification. A special case of syphilis was identified by this method. Results According to the established judgment model of the detection results of denatured and non-denatured antigens paired with western blot antibody spectrum of syphilis, 56 clinical samples of T. pallidum antibody screening were false positive, but none of the four denatured recombinant antigens had any reaction and no positive band. However, there were weak positive reactions to more than two non-denatured antigens, and positive bands appeared. The control samples of 25 syphilis patients all reacted to four non-denatured and denatured recombinant antigens of T. pallidum and showed strong positive bands. The samples of 30 health check-ups showed no reaction to four non-denatured and denatured recombinant antigens. The serum samples of special “syphilis patients” with positive specific antibody against Treponema were negative for four denatured recombinant antigens, but positive for four non-denatured recombinant antigens. The patient was diagnosed as IgGλ monoclonal immunoglobulin by serum immunofixation electrophoresis analysis and clinical data. Conclusion The detection of denatured recombinant antigen of T. pallidum immunoblotting antibody profile could effectively identify the false positive samples of clinical syphilis . However, for the

参考文献/References:

[1] ISHIHARA Y, OKAMOTO K, SHIMOSAKA H, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients with biologically false-positive reactions with serological syphilis testing in contemporary practice: 10-year experience at a tertiary academic hospital[J]. Infections Sexually Transmitted, 2021, 97(6): 397-401.
[2] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会 . WS273-2018:梅毒诊断 (WS 273-2018): [S]. 北京 :中国标准出版社 , 2018. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. WS273-2018: Syphilis diagnosis[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2018.
[3] LIU Fan, LIU Lili, GUO Xiaojing, et al. Characterization of the classical biological false-positive reaction in the serological test for syphilis in the modern era[J]. International Immunopharmacology, 2014, 20(2): 331-336.
[4] 张微 , 郭楠 , 李宝萍 , 等 .化学发光微粒子免疫检测梅毒抗体假阳性分析 [J].中国卫生检验杂志 , 2021, 31(10): 1180-1182． ZHANG Wei, GUO Nan, LI Baoping, et al. An analysis of false-positive results of chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay in detecting Treponema pallidum antibodies [J]. Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology, 2021, 31(10): 1180-1182.
[5] 郑淑华 , 黄瑞玉 , 卢春敏 , 等．化学发光法和 TPPA试验检测妇幼人群梅毒螺旋体抗体假阳性对比分析 [J]．中国皮肤性病学杂志 , 2021, 35(3): 349-352． ZHENG Shuhua, HUANG Ruiyu, LU Chunmin, et al. Comparative analysis of chemoluminescence and TPPA test for false-positive of Treponema pallidum antibody in women and children[J]. The Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology, 2021, 35(3): 349-352.
[6] 何涛君 , 莫凡 , 肖晓友 , 等．多发性骨髓瘤 M蛋白与梅毒血清学假阳性的关系 [J].中国实验血液学杂志 , 2016, 24(2): 478-481. HE Taojun, MO Fan, XIAO Xiaoyou, et al. Relationship between M-protein of multiple myeloma and false positive syphilis serological results[J]. Journal of Experimental Hematology, 2016, 24(2): 478-481.
[7] MATTHIAS J, KLINGLER E J, SCHILLINGER J A, et al. Frequency and characteristics of biological False-Positive test results for syphilis reported in florida and New York city, USA, 2013 to 2017[J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2019, 57(11): e00898-19.
[8] TUDDENHAM S, KATZ S S, GHANEM K G. Syphilis laboratory guidelines: performance characteristics of nontreponemal antibody tests[J]. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2020, 71(Suppl 1): S21-S42.
[9] TONG Manli, LIN Lirong, LIU Lili, et al. Analysis of 3 algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis and implications for clinical management[J]. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2014, 58(8): 1116-1124.
[10] 徐萌 , 绳波 , 陈浩南 , 等 . 44 558例患者梅毒螺旋体抗体检测及假阳性分析 [J].中华实验和临床感染病杂志 (电子版 ), 2021, 15(2): 105-110． XU Meng, SHENG Bo, CHEN Hao-nan, et al. Analysis of antibody detection of Treponema pallidum and the false positive results of 44558 patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(2): 105-110.
[11] 王欣俞 , 赵晋文 , 张延海 , 等．四种梅毒血清学检测方法在梅毒抗体不确定样本的分析及评价 [J].现代检验医学杂志 , 2019, 34(3): 109-111, 114． WANG Xinyu, ZHAO Jinwen, ZHANG Yanhai, et al. Analysis and evaluation of four syphilis detection methods in uncertain samples of syphilis antibody[J]. Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine, 2019, 34(3): 109-111, 114.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐敬轩a,夏 毅a,谢而付,等.丹阳地区农民梅毒感染状况调查[J].现代检验医学杂志,2016,31(02):141.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2016.02.043]
　XU Jing-xuana,XIA Yia,XIE Er-fu,et al.Investigation on the Status of Farmers of Syphilis Infection in Danyang Area[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2016,31(02):141.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2016.02.043]
[2]于连辉,崔京涛,贾妍,等.梅毒实验诊断中增强化学发光技术与其它血清学比对以及在急诊筛查流程的探讨[J].现代检验医学杂志,2015,30(05):123.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.05.038]
　YU Lian-hui,CUI Jing-tao,JIA Yan,et al.Commparision of Enhanced Chemiluminescence Technologies with Other Syphilis Serology and the Application for Screening Procedure in a Stat Laboratory[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2015,30(02):123.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.05.038]
[3]吴晓康a,张妮a,尹佳锋a,等.大样本人群血清梅毒抗体检测结果分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2015,30(06):130.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.06.040]
　WU Xiao-kanga,ZHANG Nia,YIN Jia-Fenga,et al.Analysis on Syphilis Detection Results of Large Populations[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2015,30(02):130.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.06.040]
[4]房笃智,阳 建,杨荣志,等.梅毒螺旋体四种膜蛋白 克隆重组表达和ELISA法建立的应用研究[J].现代检验医学杂志,2015,30(01):75.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.01.020]
　FANG Du-zhi,YANG Jian,YANG Rong-zhi,et al.Cloning Recombinant Expression of Treponema Pallidum Four Kinds of Membrane Protein and Application of Establishing ELISA Method[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2015,30(02):75.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.01.020]
[5]安 哲,王香玲.2014版欧洲梅毒管理指南(实验室诊断部分)[J].现代检验医学杂志,2016,31(04):162.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2016.04.048]
[6]王 欢,朱参胜,蔺兆星,等.陕西省梅毒血清学检测室间质量评价结果分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2017,32(01):157.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2017.01.044]
　WANG Huan,ZHU Can-sheng,LIN Zhao-xing,et al.External Quality Assessment of Syphilis Serological Tests in Shaanxi[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2017,32(02):157.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2017.01.044]
[7]徐敬轩,夏 毅,彭文红,等.梅毒筛查中甲苯胺红不加热血清试验改良方法与传统方法的比较[J].现代检验医学杂志,2017,32(03):133.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2017.03.037]
　XU Jing-xuan,XIA Yi,PENG Wen-hong,et al.Comparison of the Improved Method and the Traditional Method for Toluidine Red Unheated Serum Test in Syphilis Screening[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2017,32(02):133.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2017.03.037]
[8]谭梅娟,李 靖.精神分裂症患者梅毒感染的流行病学调查[J].现代检验医学杂志,2018,33(04):125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2018.04.034]
　TAN Mei-juan,LI Jing.Study on Syphilis Infection among Inpatients with Schizophrenia[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2018,33(02):125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2018.04.034]
[9]谭玉华,雷泽洪,郑 丹,等.双抗原夹心时间分辨荧光免疫法检测梅毒螺旋体特异性总抗体的性能研究[J].现代检验医学杂志,2018,33(02):97.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2018.02.001]
　TAN Yu-hua,LEI Ze-hong,ZHENG Dan,et al.Evaluation of Double Antigen Sandwich Time-resolved Fluoroimmunoassay for Specific Total Antibodies to Treponema Pallidum[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2018,33(02):97.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2018.02.001]
[10]王欣俞,赵晋文,张延海,等.四种梅毒血清学检测方法在梅毒抗体不确定样本的分析及评价[J].现代检验医学杂志,2019,34(03):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2019.03.026]
　WANG Xin-yu,ZHAO Jin-wen,ZHANG Yan-hai,et al.Analysis and Evaluation of Four Syphilis Detection Methodsin Uncertain Samples of Syphilis Antibody[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2019,34(02):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2019.03.026]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2022-08-05修回日期：2022-11-28
作者简介：彭振亚（1991-），女，本科，主管技师，主要从事临床检验及感染性疾病研究， E-mail: 707292425@qq.com。
通讯作者：张银辉（1963-），女，大专，主任技师，主要从事临床检验及感染性疾病研究， E-mail: lanhuacao0255@163.com。

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-03-15