[1]刘国振,陈秀余,张修欢.血清 miR-122-5p,miR-486-5p,AFP及 AFP-L3水平联合检测对原发性肝癌的诊断价值[J].现代检验医学杂志,2022,37(01):82-87.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2022.01.017]
 LIU Guo-zhen,CHEN Xiu-yu,ZHANG Xiu-huan.Value of Combined Detection of Serum miR-122-5p, miR-486-5p, AFP and AFP-L3 Levels in the Diagnosis of Primary LiverCancer[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2022,37(01):82-87.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2022.01.017]
点击复制

血清 miR-122-5p,miR-486-5p,AFP及 AFP-L3水平联合检测对原发性肝癌的诊断价值()
分享到:

《现代检验医学杂志》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
第37卷
期数:
2022年01期
页码:
82-87
栏目:
论 著
出版日期:
2022-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Value of Combined Detection of Serum miR-122-5p, miR-486-5p, AFP and AFP-L3 Levels in the Diagnosis of Primary LiverCancer
文章编号:
1671-7414(2022)01-082-06
作者:
刘国振陈秀余张修欢
(安徽医科大学附属六安医院/ 六安市人民医院核医学科 , 安徽六安 237005)
Author(s):
LIU Guo-zhen CHEN Xiu-yu ZHANG Xiu-huan
(Department of Nuclear Medicine, Lu’an Hospital, Anhui Medical University/Lu’an People’s Hospital, Anhui Lu’an 237005 , China)
关键词:
血清 miR-122-5p血清 miR-486-5p甲胎蛋白甲胎蛋白异质体原发性肝癌
分类号:
R735.7;R730.43
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2022.01.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨血清 miR-122-5p,miR-486-5p,甲胎蛋白( alpha fetoprotein,AFP)和甲胎蛋白异质体( alpha-fetoprotein isosomes,AFP-L3)联合检测对原发性肝癌( primary carcinoma)的诊断价值。方法 收集 2017年 2月~ 2020年 5月六安市人民医院原发性肝癌患者( n=100)作为观察组,同时间六安市人民医院入院治疗良性肝脏病患者( n=88)作为对照组 ,同时收集同期入院健康体检者 (n=80)为空白对照组。测定各组血清 miR-122-5p,miR-486-5p,AFP及 AFP-L3的表达水平;分析不同病理下 miR-122-5p,miR-486-5p,AFP及 AFP-L3水平;分析 miR-122-5p,miR-486-5p,AFP和 AFP-L3水平及其联合检测在原发性肝癌患者中的诊断价值。结果 观察组血清 AFP及 AFP-L3水平高于空白对照组及对照组,差异有统计学意义( F=34.253,16.845,均 P=0.000);对照组 AFP及 AFP-L3水平高于空白对照组,观察组血清 miR-122-5p和 miR-486-5p水平低于空白对照组及对照组,差异有统计学意义( F=9.532,11.516,均 P=0.000);对照组 miR-122-5p和 miR-486-5p水平低于空白对照组,差异均有统计学意义( P< 0.05)。观察组不同病理下血清 miR-122-5p,miR-486-5p,AFP及 AFP-L3水平比较发现,在性别、年龄及病灶数目上差异均无统计学意义( t=-1.711~0.434,均 P> 0.05),在肿瘤直径、 TNM分期、门静脉癌栓、脏器转移及淋巴结转移上差异有统计学意义(t=-7.132~12.485,P< 0.05)。血清 miR-122-5p,miR-486-5p,AFP及 AFP-L3联合检测其敏感度和特异度分别为
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effects of combined detection of serum miR-122-5p, miR-486-5p, alpha fetoprotein (AFP),and alpha-fetoprotein isosomes (AFP-L3) on primary the diagnostic value of liver cancer. Methods Patients with primary livercancer (n=100) from Lu’an People’s Hospital were collected as the observation group, and patients with benign liver disease(n=88) admitted to Lu’an People’s Hospital were collected as the control group. At the same time, patients who were admitted tothe hospital for physical examination (n= 80) was the blank control group. Measured the expression levels of serum miR-122-5p,miR-486-5p, AFP and AFP-L3 in each group. Analyzed the levels of miR-122-5p, miR-486-5p, AFP and AFP-L3 under differentpathologies and analyzed miR the diagnostic value of -122-5p, miR-486-5p, AFP, AFP-L3 levels and their combined detection inpatients with primary liver cancer. Results The levels of serum AFP and AFP-L3 in the observation group were higher thanthose in the blank control group and the control group, the differences between groups were statistically significant(F=34.253,16.845, all P=0.000), the levels of AFP and AFP-L3 in the control group were higher than those in the blank control group. Theserum levels of miR-122-5p and miR-486-5p in the observation group were lower than those in the blank control group. and thecontrol group, the differences between groups were statistically significant(F=9.532, 11.516, all P = 0.000 1), the levels of miR-122-5p and miR-486-5p in the control group were lower than the blank control group, and the differences were statisticallysignificant (P<0.05). Comparison of serum miR-122-5p, miR-486-5p, AFP and AFP-L3 levels in the observation group underdifferent pathologies found that there were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, and number of lesions (t=-1.711~0.434, all P> 0.05), there were statistical differences in tumor diameter, TNM stage, portal vein tumor thrombus, organmetastasis and lymph node metastasis (t=-7.132~12.485, P<0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of serum miR-122-5p, miR-486-5p, AFP and AFP-L3 combined detection were 92.37% and 90.45% respectively, AUC was 0.945, which was significantlyhigher than miR-122-5p, miR-486- 5p, single detection of AFP and AFP-L3, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=8.165,P < 0.05). Conclusion The combined detection of serum miR-122-5p, miR-486-5p, AFP and AFP-L3 can improve thediagnostic value of primary liver cancer, all of which are involved in the pathogenesis of primary liver cancer, and may be used todiagnose primary liver cancer. The effective index is worthy of clinical promotion.

参考文献/References:

[1] SHAH S C, ZHU Xiangzhu, DAI Qi, et al. Magnesiumintake is associated with a reduced risk of incidentliver cancer, based on an analysis of the NIH-AmericanAssociation of Retired Persons (NIH-AARP) Diet andHealth Study prospective cohort[J]. The AmericanJournal of Clinical Nutrition, 2021, 113(3): 630-638.
[2] 中华医学会肝病学分会. 原发性肝癌二级预防共识(2021 年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2021,37(3):532-542.Chinese Society of Hepatology,Chinese MedicalAssociation. Consensus on the secondary preventionfor primary liver cancer(2021 edition) [J]. Journal ofClinical Hepatology, 2021,37(3):532-542.
[3] 中华预防医学会肝胆胰疾病预防与控制专业委员会,中国研究型医院学会肝病专业委员会,中华医学会肝病学分会,等. 原发性肝癌的分层筛查与监测指南(2020 版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2021, 37(2):286-295.Professional Committee for Prevention and Controlof Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases of ChinesePreventive Medicine Association, ProfessionalCommittee for Hepatology, Chinese Research HospitalAssociation, Chinese Society of Hepatology, ChineseMedical Association, et al. Guideline for stratifiedscreening and surveillance of primary liver cancer (2020edition)[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2021, 37(2):286-295.
[4] 中华医学会感染病学分会, 中华医学会肝病学分会. 慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2019 年版)[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志,2020,23(1):9-32.Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese MedicalAssociation, Chinese Society of Hepatology, ChineseMedical Association.The guidelines of preventionand treatment for chronic hepatitis B (2019 version)[J].Journal of Practical Hepatology,2020,23(1):9-32.
[5] 中华医学会肝病学分会药物性肝病学组. 药物性肝损伤诊治指南[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2015, 31(11):1752-1769.Drug-Induced Liver Disease Study Group,ChineseSociety of Hepatology,Chinese Medical Association.Guidelines for the management of drug-inducedliver injury[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology,2015,31(11):1752-1769.
[6] 中华医学会肝病学分会脂肪肝和酒精性肝病学组,中国医师协会脂肪性肝病专家委员会. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病防治指南(2018 更新版)[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志,2018,26(3):195-203.National Workshop on Fatty Liver and Alcoholic LiverDisease,Chinese Society of Hepatology,ChineseMedical Association, Fatty Liver Expert Committee,Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Guidelinesof prevention and treatment for nonalcoholic fattyliver disease: a 2018 update [J]. Chinese Journal ofHepatology,2018,26(3):195-203.
[7] 中华医学会肝病学分会脂肪肝和酒精性肝病学组,中国医师协会脂肪性肝病专家委员会.酒精性肝病防治指南(2018 更新版)[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2018,26(3):188-194.National Workshop on Fatty Liver and Alcoholic LiverDisease,Chinese Society of Hepatology,ChineseMedical Association, Fatty Liver Expert Committee,Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Guidelinesof prevention and treatment for alcoholic liver disease:a 2018 update [J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatology,2018,26(3):188-194.
[8] GIGANTE E, PARADIS V, RONOT M, et al. Newinsights into the pathophysiology and clinical care ofrare primary liver cancers[J]. JHEP Reports, 2021, 3(1):100174.
[9] SIYIN S T, LIU Tong, LI Wenqiang, et al. A prospectivefollow-up study of the relationship betweenhigh-sensitivity C-reactive protein and primary livercancer[J]. BMC Cancer, 2020, 20(1): 1168.
[10] OZAWA H, HIRAYAMA A, SHOJI F, et al. Comprehensivedipeptide analysis revealed Cancer-Specificprofile in the liver of patients with hepatocellular carcinomaand hepatitis[J]. Metabolites, 2020, 10(11): 442.
[11] YU Haixia, HAN Ruixue, SU Jie, et al. Multimarkerdiagnosis method for early HepatocellularCarcinoma based on surface plasmon resonance[J].Clinica Chimica acta; International Journal of ClinicalChemistry, 2020, 502: 9-14.
[12] QI Famei, ZHOU Aihua, YAN Li, et al. The diagnosticvalue of PIVKA-II, AFP, AFP-L3, CEA, and theircombinations in primary and metastatic hepatocellularcarcinoma[J]. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis,2020, 34(5): e23158.
[13] YEN C W, KUO Y H, WANG J H, et al. Did AFP-L3save ultrasonography in community screening?[J]. TheKaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 2018, 34(10):583-587.
[14] 段云, 杨颖卓, 杨雯, 等. 血清AFP,AFP-L3,HSP90α 表达水平在肝细胞癌诊断中的价值[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2021,42(5):590-593.DUAN Yun,YANG Yingzhuo,YANG Wen,et al. Thevalue of serum AFP,AFP-L3 and HSP90α in thediagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. InternationalJournal of Laboratory Medicine, 2021,42(5):590-593.
[15] 王蓉, 蔡高涛, 钟小青, 等. 血清AFP-L3 和GP-73联合检测对原发性肝癌诊断的Meta 分析[J]. 现代检验医学杂志,2019,34(2):72-75, 78.WANG Rong,CAI Gaotao,ZHONG Xiaoqing,et al. Metaanalysis of combined detection of serum AFP-L3 and GP-73 in diagnosis of primary liver cancer[J]. Journal of ModernLaboratory Medicine, 2019, 34(2): 72-75, 78.
[16] 颜丽, 魏莲花, 齐发梅, 等. 血清TSGF,AFP,CEA 和FER 联合检测在肝脏恶性肿瘤诊断中的应用价值[J]. 现代检验医学杂志, 2018, 33(5): 24-26, 141.YAN Li,WEI Lianhua,QI Famei,et al. Significance ofcombined detection of TSGF,AFP,CEA and FER in thediagnosis of hepatic malignancy[J]. Journal of ModernLaboratory Medicine, 2018,33(5):24-26, 141.
[17] THANAPIROM K, SUKSAWATAMNUAY S,GERATIKORNSUPUK N, et al. Mo1400 role ofPIVKA-II and AFP-l3 in combination with AFP fordetection and prediction of mortality for hepatocellularcarcinoma among patients with cirrhosis[J].Gastroenterology, 2020, 158(6): 1623.
[18] LONG Jiali, HE Qinglian, YIN Yuting, et al. The effectof miRNA and autophagy on colorectal cancer[J]. CellProliferation, 2020, 53(10): e12900.
[19] 何佳, 肖斌, 杭建峰, 等. 血清miR-122-5 p 和miR-486-5p 在肝癌诊断中的临床应用[J]. 中华检验医学杂志,2018,41(1):41-46.HE Jia, XIAO Bin, HANG Jianfeng,et al. Clinicalapplication of serum miR-122-5p and miR-486-5p inthe diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. ChineseJournal of Laboratory Medicine, 2018,41(1):41-46.
[20] 谢静, 郭振凯. 长链非编码RNA FOXD2-AS1 通过靶向miR-122-5p 调控肝癌细胞增殖、侵袭和迁移的分子机制[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020, 40(22): 4857-4862.XIE Jing, GUO Zhenkai. The molecular mechanismof long non-coding RNA FOXD2-AS1 regulating theproliferation, invasion and migration of liver cancercells by targeting miR-122-5 p[J]. Chinese Journal ofGerontology, 2020,40(22):4857-4862.
[21] 高俊.LINC01551 通过miR-122-5p/ADAM10 信号轴促进肝癌发生发展的机制研究[D]. 南昌:南昌大学, 2020.GAO Jun. Mechanism of LINC01551 via the miR-122-5p/ADAM10 signaling pathway in progressionof hepatocellular carcinoma[D]. Nanchang: NanchangUniversity, 2020.
[22] 杨文聪, 魏统双. 血清miR-122-5p 水平联合MSCT对肝癌的诊断价值[J]. 中国CT 和MRI 杂志, 2021,19(4): 86-89.YANG Wencong,WEI Tongshuang. Diagnostic valueof serum miR-122-5p level combined with MSCTfor liver cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of CT and MRI.2021,19(4):86-89.
[23] 陈曦阳, 杨柳莹, 赵芹弘. 4 种血清微RNAs 联合检测在原发性肝癌临床筛查中的诊断价值[J]. 重庆医学, 2020,49(13):2174-2178.CHEN Xiyang YANG Liuying ZHAO Qinhong. Diagnosticvalue of four serum microRNA combined detectionin clinical screening of hepatocelluar carcinoma [J].Chongqing Medicine, 2020,49(13):2174-2178.
[24] LIANG Guangmin, WU Jin, XU Lei. A prognosisrelatedbased method for miRNA selection on liverhepatocellular carcinoma prediction[J]. ComputationalBiology and Chemistry, 2021, 91(D1):107433.
[25] WANG Hongzhi, ELLIPILLI S, LEE W J, et al.Multivalent rubber-like RNA nanoparticles for targetedco-delivery of paclitaxel and miRNA to silence the drugefflux transporter and liver cancer drug resistance[J].Journal of Controlled Release, 2021, 330(7): 173-184.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:刘国振(1983-),男,本科,主管技师,研究方向:肺癌诊断治疗,E-mail:ly11975042322@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01