[1]章晓燕,王薇,张传宝,等.用室间质量评价西格玛图评价脂类项目不同检测系统的质量水平[J].现代检验医学杂志,2015,30(06):80-83.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.06.023]
 ZHANG Xiao-yan,WANG Wei,ZHANG Chuan-bao,et al.Assessing Quality of Different Measuring Systems on the Sigma Scale from External Quality Assessment[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2015,30(06):80-83.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.06.023]
点击复制

用室间质量评价西格玛图评价脂类项目不同检测系统的质量水平()
分享到:

《现代检验医学杂志》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2015年06期
页码:
80-83
栏目:
质量控制·实验室管理
出版日期:
2015-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Assessing Quality of Different Measuring Systems on the Sigma Scale from External Quality Assessment
作者:
章晓燕王薇张传宝赵海建王治国
北京医院 卫生部临床检验中心,北京100730
Author(s):
ZHANG Xiao-yanWANG WeiZHANG Chuan-baoZHAO Hai-jianWANG Zhi-guo
National Center for Clinical Laboratories,Beijing Hospital,Beijing 100730,China
关键词:
室间质量评价偏倚不精密度西格玛质量
分类号:
R446
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.06.023
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨用室间质量评价西格玛图评价脂类正确度验证不同检测系统的质量水平。方法收集参加2014年第1次全国脂类正确度验证室间质量评价获得的数据,计算Bias%和CV%,可构建一种“室间质量评价西格玛图”,以评价不同检测系统的不精密度和偏倚,并以西格玛水平表示检测系统的质量。结果剔除异常值和小于5家实验室的检测系统数据,分别以项目要求的TEa%规范进行分析。血清总胆固醇201411和201412样品的平均偏倚分别为2.10%和2.17%,平均CV%为3.17%和3.21%,加权西格玛分别为2.53和2.50;血清总三酰甘油201411和201412样品的加权西格玛为4.16和5.10;高密度脂蛋白胆固醇201411和201412样品的加权西格玛为4.53和4.48;低密度脂蛋白胆固醇201411和201412样品加权西格玛为4.98和2.67。从西格玛图中可直观地看到不同检测系统的西格玛水平。结论用西格玛水平评估质量可提供实现预期用途要求的分析性能证据,有助于实验室检验分析质量中的识别和优化改进。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo discuss the application of Six Sigma concepts and metrics,which can provide an objective assessment of current analytical quality of different examination procedures.MethodsThe data were collected from laboratories participated in anlipid survey in 2014.A “Sigma External Quality Assessment Chart” could be constructed for data obtained from external quality assessment surveys to evaluate the observed imprecision and bias of method subgroups and determine quality on the Sigma scale.ResultsAbnormal values and the system whose quantity was less than 5 were excluded.When evaluated against the NCCL requirement of an allowable total error,the weighted average were 2.53 Sigma for 201411 sample of total cholesterol (average bias 2.10%,CV 3.17%) and 2.50 Sigma for 201412(average bias 2.17%,CV 3.21%),respictively.The weighted average were 4.16 Sigma for 201411 sample of total glycerol (average bias 3.98%,CV 6.38%) and 5.10 Sigma for 201412(average bias 3.65%,CV 4.71%),respictively.The weighted average were 4.53 Sigma for 201411 sample of HDL-C (average bias 2.65%,CV 6.94%) and 4.48 Sigma for 201412(average bias 1.91%,CV 6.74%),respictively.The weighted average were 4.98 Sigma for 201411 sample of LDL-C (average bias 2.99%,CV 5.98%) and 2.67 Sigma for 201412(average bias 14.57%,CV 5.93%),respictively.The sigma scale can be seen from the Sigma External Quality Assessment Chart.ConclusionAssessment of quality on the Sigma scale provides evidence of the analytical performance that is being achieved relative to requirement for intended use and should be useful for identifying and prioritizing improvements that are needed in the analytical quality of laboratory examinations.

参考文献/References:

[1]Plebani M.The CCLM contribution to improvements in quality and patient safety[J].Clin Chem Lab Med,2013,51(1):39-46.
[2]王治国.临床检验6σ质量控制设计与控制[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:32-36. Wang ZG.Six sigma quality design and control in clinical laboratory[M].Beijing:People’s Medical Publishing House,2012:32-36.
[3]王治国.临床检验方法确认与性能验证[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:298-300. Wang ZG.Methods vaidation and performance verification in clinical laboratory[M].Beijing:People’s Medical Publishing House,2009:298-300.
[4]王治国.临床检验质量控制技术[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:621-634. Wang ZG.Quality control technology in clinical laboratory[M].3th Ed.Beijing:People’s Medical Publishing House,2014:621-634.
[5]Westgard JO,Westgard SA.The quality of laboratory testing today: an assessment of sigma metrics for analytical quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance[J].Am J Clin Pathol,2006,125(3):343-354.
[6]Westgard JO,Westgard SA.Basic quality manageme-nt systems:essentials for quality management in the medical laboratory[M].Madison WI:Westgard QC,Inc,2014:234-235.
[7]张丽,陈曦.血清高敏C-反应蛋白与心血管病的研究进展[J].国际检验医学杂志,2006,27(5):435-436,439. Zhang L,Chen X.The research progress of C-reactive protein serum lipid and cardiovascular disease[J].Internationnal Journal of Laboratory Medicine,2006,27(5):435-436,439.
[8]Boden WE.High-density lipoprotein cholesterol as an independent risk factor in cardiovascular disease:assessing the data from Framingham to the Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial[J].Am J Cardial,2000,86(12A):19-22.
[9]Magnusson B,Ellison SL.Treatment of uncorrected measurement bias in uncertainty estimation for chemical measurements[J].Anal Bioanal Chem,2008,390(1):201-213.

相似文献/References:

[1]何法霖,王 薇,钟 堃,等.血红蛋白A2和F的室间质量评价结果分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2015,30(02):156.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.02.050]
 HE Fa-lin,WANG Wei,ZHONG Kun,et al.External Quality Assessment of Hemoglobin A2(HbA2) and Hemoglobin F(HbF)Measurement[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2015,30(06):156.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.02.050]
[2]李婷婷,王 薇,赵海建,等.临床实验室室间质量评价结果解释及不合格结果原因调查的建议性方法李婷婷,王 薇,赵海建,等[J].现代检验医学杂志,2017,32(05):152.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2017.05.017]
 LI Ting-ting,WANG Wei,ZHAO Hai-jian,et al.Interpretation of External Quality Assessment Results in Clinical Laboratories and Suggested Approach on Investigating Unacceptable Results[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2017,32(06):152.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2017.05.017]
[3]王 青,蒋玲丽,朱 俊,等.2019 年上海市医疗机构临床POCT 检测质量调查分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2020,35(03):146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2020.03.039]
 WANG Qing,JIANG Ling-li,ZHU Jun,et al.Quality Analysis of POCT in Shanghai Hopitals in 2019[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2020,35(06):146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2020.03.039]
[4]张楠楠a,李淮淮b,王绪山a.6σ 质量管理在凝血酶原时间室间质量评价与室内质量控制分析应用[J].现代检验医学杂志,2020,35(03):149.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2020.03.040]
 ZHANG Nan-nana,LI Huai-huaib,WANG Xu-shana.Application of 6 σ Theory on Prothrombin Time Quality Management Through the Data from External Quality Assessment and Internal Quality Control[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2020,35(06):149.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2020.03.040]
[5]谢小娟,孙晶晶,樊港港,等.2020年陕西省二级公立医院临床实验室室间质量评价参加率和合格率调查分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2021,36(04):167.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2021.04.036]
 XIE Xiao-juan,SUN Jing-jing,FAN Gang-gang,et al.Investigation and Analysis of External Quality Assessment Participation andAcceptable Rates of Clinical Laboratories of Secondary Public Hospitals inShaanxi Province in 2020[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2021,36(06):167.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2021.04.036]
[6]钟 堃a,方 遥b,王艳惠c.临床实验室室间质量评价不同计划的结果评价探讨与研究[J].现代检验医学杂志,2022,37(02):162.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2022.02.033]
 ZHONG Kuna,FANG Yaob,WANG Yan-huic.Discussion and Research on the Result Evaluation of External Quality Assessment Scheme for Clinical Laboratory[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2022,37(06):162.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2022.02.033]
[7]杨依绡,肖艳群,黄中强,等.上海市及其他地区临床实验室B 族链球菌核酸检测室间质量评价分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2023,38(03):204.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2023.03.038]
 YANG Yi-xiao,XIAO Yan-qun,HUANG Zhong-qiang,et al.Results of External Quality Assessment for Group B Streptococcus DNA Testing in Shanghai and Other Regions[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2023,38(06):204.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2023.03.038]
[8]徐 幸,王国飞,杨依绡,等.2020~2022年度上海及其他省市临床实验室HPV6型与HPV11型核酸检测室间质量评价结果分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2024,39(01):179.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2024.01.034]
 XU Xing,WANG Guofei,YANG Yixiao,et al.Analysis of External Quality Assessment Results for HPV6 and HPV11 Nucleic Acid Testing in Clinical Laboratories of Shanghai and Other Provinces and Cities from 2020 to 2022[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2024,39(06):179.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2024.01.034]
[9]张芃胤,权 静,肖艳群,等.上海地区临床实验室运动神经元存活基因外显子缺失项目检测能力的室间质量评价分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2024,39(06):223.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2024.06.039]
 ZHANG Pengyin,QUAN Jing,XIAO Yanqun,et al.External Quality Assessment for Deletion of Exons in the Survival Motor Neuron Gene in Clinical Laboratories of Shanghai[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2024,39(06):223.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2024.06.039]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:北京市自然科学基金(基金编号:7143182),北京医院课题资助(BJ-2015-025)。 作者简介:章晓燕(1992-),硕士研究生,研究方向为实验室质量管理。 通讯作者:王治国,研究员,E-mail:zgwang@nccl.org.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01