[1]薛万华,杨 婷.创伤性颅脑损伤患者血液NSE,hsCRP水平和NLR指标与疾病程度相关价值研究[J].现代检验医学杂志,2018,33(05):35-37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2018.05.010]
　XUE Wan-hua,YANG Ting.Study on the Correlation of Disease Severity with the Serum NSE,sCRP Level and NLR in TBI Patients[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2018,33(05):35-37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2018.05.010]
点击复制

创伤性颅脑损伤患者血液NSE,hsCRP水平和NLR指标与疾病程度相关价值研究()
分享到：

《现代检验医学杂志》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
第33卷
期数:
2018年05期
页码:
35-37
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2018-11-18

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Correlation of Disease Severity with the Serum NSE,sCRP Level and NLR in TBI Patients
文章编号:
1671-7414(2018)05-035-03
作者:
薛万华; 杨 婷
德州市人民医院检验科,山东德州 253000
Author(s):
XUE Wan-hua; YANG Ting
Department of Clinical Laboratory,Dezhou People's Hospital,Shandong Dezhou 253000,China
关键词:
创伤性颅脑损伤;  神经元特异性烯醇化酶;  高敏C-反应蛋白;  中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比率
分类号:
R651.15; R446.112
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2018.05.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 检测血液神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE),高敏C-反应蛋白(hsCRP)和中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比率(NLR)在不同严重程度的创伤性颅脑损伤患者中的水平变化并探讨其相关价值。方法 将117例创伤性颅脑损伤患者按GCS评分分为轻、中、重三组,并选择40例健康体检者作为对照组,分别检测患者和健康对照组NSE,hsCRP和NLR水平,并分析三个指标相关性。结果 与对照组相比,创伤性颅脑损伤(traumatic brain injury,TBI)患者血液NSE(t=13.66,P<0.01),hsCRP(t=17.00,P<0.01)和NLR(t=6.43,P<0.01)均显著升高,且随损伤程度的加重,三项指标升高程度增加。进一步分组结果显示,TBI患者NSE,hsCRP和NLR水平在轻型组分别为21.33±6.08 μg/L,15.31±3.74 mg/L和2.19(1.36～4.32),在中型组为32.86±12.67 μg/L,35.35±13.19 mg/L和1.92(0.86～2.47),重型组为58.09±26.25 μg/L,60.908 3±31.70 mg/L和6.49(4.61～9.39),与对照组中三者的水平8.71±5.54 μg/L,2.73±1.59 mg/L和1.745(1.188～2.95)相比,除NLR在轻型组升高水平不显著(P=0.188)外,其他组别和检测指标均显著升高(P<0.01)。在TBI患者中,轻、中、重三组NSE和hsCRP血清水平均存在明显差异(P<0.01),NLR水平在轻型组与重型组,中型组与重型组中均存在明显差异(P<0.05)。相关性分析显示,TBI患者NSE与NLR显著相关(r=0.440,P<0.01),NSE与hsCRP显著相关(r=0.571,P<0.01),NLR与hsCRP显著相关(r=0.416,P<0.01)。结论 TBI患者血液NSE,hsCRP水平和NLR指标明显升高且具有相关性,三项指标联合检测有助于TBI的临床诊断和分型。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the levels of NSE,hsCRP and NLR in traumatic brain injury(TBI)patients and evaluate their correlation with the disease severity.Methods The levels of NSE,hsCRP and NLR were determined in patients with slight,medium and severe TBI according to Glasgow coma scale(GCS)score and healthy control group.The correlation of them was explored.Results Compared with control group,the levels of NSE,hsCRP and NLR in TBI group were significantly different(t=13.66,17.00,6.43,all P<0.01).The three parameters showed 21.33±6.08 μg/L,15.31±3.74 mg/L and 2.19(1.36～4.32)in slight TBI patients,32.86±12.67 μg/L,35.35±13.19 mg/L and 1.92(0.86～2.47),in medium TBI patients,and 58.09±26.25 μg/L,60.908 3±31.70 mg/L and 6.49(4.61～9.39)in heavy patients respectively.Compared with control group,the three indexes were all significantly elevated,except for the level of NLR in slight TBI group.NSE levels were positively correlated with NLR and hsCRP(r=0.440,0.571,P<0.01),and NLR were positively correlated with hsCRP(r=0.416,P<0.01).Conlusion There were statistical significance of NSE and hsCRP in three different severity TBI groups.Combined detection of three parameters is helpful for clinical diagnosis and typing of TBI.

参考文献/References:

[1] 卜晓敏,宋佳希,樊春荔,等.颅脑损伤患者血清αⅡ血影蛋白裂解产物(SBDPs)水平检测的临床意义[J].现代检验医学杂志,2017,32(1):9-11,15.
Bu XM,Song JX,Fan CL,et al.Study on serum levels of SBDPs and their clinical significance in patients with traumatic brain injury[J].J Mod Lab Med,2017,32(1):9-11,15.
[2] 高 峰,迟景宏,王欣平,等.急性脑梗死患者血清Caspase-3和神经元特异性烯醇化酶的表达及意义[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,38(1):73-75.
Gao F,Chi JH,Wang XP,et al.The expression of caspase-3 and NSEand their significance in TBI patients[J].Chin J Ger,2018,38(1):73-75.
[3] Sieber M,Dre(¨overa)(¨overr)ler J,Franke H,et al.Post-mortem biochemistry of NSE and S100B:A supplemental tool for detecting a lethal traumaticbrain injury?[J].J Forensic Leg Med,2018,55:65-73.
[4] 梁 鑫,李玉雄,张 凌,等.颅脑损伤后脑脊液NSE S100β水平动态变化与颅内压异常的关系研究[J].河北医学,2017,23(12):2072-2076.
Liang X,Li YX,Zhang L,et al.The relationship between NSE S100βand ICP afeter TBI[J].Hebei Med,2017,23(12):2072-2076.
[5] Lang M,Skrifvars MB,Siironen J,et al.A pilot study of hyperoxemia onneurological injury,inflammation and oxidative stress[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2018,62(6):801-810.
[6] 贺利平,王亚平,周丽华,等.多发伤患者损伤严重程度与血清降钙素原、C反应蛋白及血清胆碱酯酶相关性分析[J].疑难病杂志,2015,14(3):272-275.
He LP,Wang YP,Zhou LH,et al.Correlation of serum procalcitonin,C-reative protein and cholinesterase in the patients with multiple trauma[J].Chin J Diffic and Compl Cas,2015,14(3):272-275.
[7] 纪玉红,司晓盼,张春立.手足口病患儿心肌酶谱、白细胞计数及hs-CRP的变化及临床意义分析[J].中国实验诊断学,2017,21(2):266-268.
Ji YH,Si XP,Zhang CL.A study of myocardial enzymogram,cytometryand hs-CRP in hand-foot-mouth disease among children[J].Chin J Lab Diagn,2017,21(2):266-268.
[8] Perisanidis C,Kornek G,Poschl PW,et al.High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is an independent marker of poor disease-specific survival in patientswith oral cancer[J].Med Oncol,2013,30(1):334.
[9] 孙硼朋.脑梗死患者外周血NLR和PLR的临床意义[J].中国现代药物应用,2018,12(2):65-66.
Sun PP.The clinical significance of NLR and PLR in cerebral infarction patients[J].Chin J Mod Drug Appl,2018,12(2):65-66.
[10] 吴恒刚.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对脑外伤后进展性出血性损伤的预测价值[J].浙江创伤外科,2016,21(3):509-511.
Wu HG.The prognostic value of NLR for PHI[J].Zhejiang J Traumatic,2016,21(3):509-511.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙树凯,田清武,刘入华,等.血清ProGRP,NSE和CEA检测对小细胞肺癌的诊断价值[J].现代检验医学杂志,2016,31(01):77.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2016.01.022]
　SUN Shu-kai,TIAN Qing-wu,LIU Ru-hua,et al.Value of Serum ProGRP,NSE and CEA Detection in Diagnosis of Small Cell Lung Cancer[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2016,31(05):77.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2016.01.022]
[2]翟海军,朱 晶.NSE在糖尿病周围神经病变中的应用价值[J].现代检验医学杂志,2015,30(04):161.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.04.050]
　ZHAI Hai-jun,ZHU Jing.Application of NSE in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2015,30(05):161.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.04.050]
[3]赵车冬,闫玉珠,吴文婧,等.血清CEA,CYFRA21-1,NSE水平在肺癌诊断与分型中的应用价值[J].现代检验医学杂志,2016,31(06):59.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2016.06.016]
　ZHAO Che-dong,YAN Yu-zhu,WU Wen-jing,et al.Application Value of Serum CEA,CYFRA21-1 and NSE Levels in the Diagnosis and Typing of Lung Cancer[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2016,31(05):59.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2016.06.016]
[4]季红兵,唐芹芳,陈思聪,等.血清肿瘤标志物HE4对肺癌的诊断价值[J].现代检验医学杂志,2017,32(02):110.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2017.02.030]
　JI Hong-bin,TANG Qin-fang,CHEN Si-cong,et al.Application of Serum HE4 in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2017,32(05):110.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2017.02.030]
[5]蒋海兵.血清ProGRP和NSE检测在小细胞肺癌诊断和放化疗监测中的价值[J].现代检验医学杂志,2018,33(06):153.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2018.06.040]
　JIANG Hai-bing.Value of Serum ProGRP and NSE Detection in the Diagnosis of Small Cell Lung Cancer and the Monitoring of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2018,33(05):153.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2018.06.040]
[6]张利祥,潘 静,赵 洁,等.痰液基细胞学检查与血清CYFRA21-1,CEA,NSE联合检测对肺癌的诊断价值[J].现代检验医学杂志,2019,34(03):99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2019.03.024]
　ZHANG Li-xiang,PAN Jing,ZHAO Jie,et al.Value of the Combined Determination of Sputum Liquid-Based Cytologyand Serum CYFRA21-1,CEA,NSE for the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2019,34(05):99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2019.03.024]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:薜万华(1963-),男,主任技师,主要从事临床检验学研究,E-mail:543328707@qq.com。
通讯作者:杨 婷,女,硕士,主要从事临床生物化学检验研究,E-mail:yangting8912@126.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-30