[1]谢小娟a,郭　华b,李小侠b,等.陕西省临床实验室检验标本可接受性质量指标统计分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2019,34(06):148-152.[doi:10.3969 ／ j.issn.1671-7414.2019.06.038]
　XIE Xiao-juana,GUO Huab,LI Xiao-xiab,et al.Investigation and Analysis on Quality Indicators of Acceptability of Clinical Test Specimens in Shaanxi Province[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2019,34(06):148-152.[doi:10.3969 ／ j.issn.1671-7414.2019.06.038]
点击复制

陕西省临床实验室检验标本可接受性质量指标统计分析 ()
分享到：

《现代检验医学杂志》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
第34卷
期数:
2019年06期
页码:
148-152
栏目:
质量控制·实验室管理
出版日期:
2019-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Investigation and Analysis on Quality Indicators of Acceptability of Clinical Test Specimens in Shaanxi Province
文章编号:
1671-7414（2019）06-148-05
作者:
谢小娟a; 郭　华b; 李小侠b; 王　晶b; 魏力强a
（陕西省人民医院a. 省临床检验中；b. 检验科，西安　710068）
Author(s):
XIE Xiao-juana;  GUO Huab;  LI Xiao-xiab;  WANG Jingb;  WEI Li-qianga
（a. Shaanxi Center for Clinical Laboratory; b. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an 710068，China）
关键词:
标本; 质量指标; 检验前
分类号:
R446
DOI:
10.3969 ／ j.issn.1671-7414.2019.06.038
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　分析陕西省临床实验室检验前标本可接受性质量指标，了解全省检验前质量控制的现状，为改进临床实 验室的检验质量、提高标本检测的准确性提供依据。方法　发放调查表，收集2018 年12 月份陕西省临床实验室基本情 况和标本类型错误率、容器错误率、采集量错误率、抗凝标本凝集率、溶血率、丢失率和血培养污染率7 项质量指标信息。 调查数据采用专业软件进行统计分析，用西格玛（σ）度量值评价实验室质量水平。结果　260 家实验室参与调查，7 项指标的回报率均高于全国总体情况。其中，血培养污染率最高，4.4% 的实验室回报结果＜ 3σ；其次是抗凝标本凝集率， 1.2% 的实验室回报结果＜ 3σ；其余指标，所有实验室回报结果均≥ 3σ，其中95% 以上的实验室≥ 4σ。结论　陕西 省临床实验室检验标本的可接受性尚需提高，持续监测标本的质量指标有助于提高标本质量，确保检测结果的准确性。
Abstract:
Objective　To analyze the quality index of acceptability of pre-examination specimens in clinical laboratories in Shaanxi province and understand the present situation of pre-examination quality control in this province, so as to provide basis for further improving the quality of clinical laboratories and improving the accuracy of pre-examination specimens. Methods　The questionnaire was issued to collect the basic information of the provincial clinical laboratory and 7 quality indicators including sample type error rate, container error rate, collection amount error rate, agglutination rate, hemolysis rate, loss rate and blood culture contamination rate in December 2018. The survey data were statistically analyzed by specialized software and the quality of the laboratory was evaluated by the sigma（σ） measurement. Results　With 260 laboratories participating in the survey, the returns on each of the seven indicators were higher than the overall national situation. Among them, the rate of contamination in blood culture was highest, and 4.4 % of laboratory returns resulted less than 3σ. Followed by the agglutination rate of anticoagulant specimens, 1.2 % of the laboratory return results were less than 3σ. For the rest of the indicators, all laboratory return results more than 3σ, and of which more than 95 % of the laboratories more than 4σ. Conclusion　The acceptability of test specimens in clinical laboratories in Shaanxi Province needs to be improved. Continuous monitoring of the quality indicators of specimens can help improve the quality of specimens and ensure the accuracy of test results.

参考文献/References:

[1]　刘小娟, 江咏梅. 临床检验标本的相关质量指标 的建立和监测及改进[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2016,39(1):10-12. LIU Xiaojuan, JIANG Yongmei. Establishment, monitoring and improvement of indicators of specimen quality in clinical laboratories[J]. Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2016,39(1):10-12.
[2]　李艳珍. 重视检验前质量控制确保检验结果准确可 靠[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2015, 44(11):1328-1329. LI Yanzhen. Attach importance to quality control before inspection to ensure the accuracy and reliability of inspection results[J].Shanxi Medical Journal, 2015, 44(11):1328-1329.
[3]　胡江红, 袁平宗, 汤雪彪, 等. 应用六西格玛性能验 证图对18 个常规化学项目的性能评价[J]. 现代检验 医学杂志, 2018, 33(6):161-164. HU Jianghong, YUAN Pingzong, TANG Xuebiao, et al. Performance evaluation of 18 conventional chemical projects using six sigma performance verification diagram[J]. Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine, 2018, 33(6): 161-164.
[4]　程秀丽, 王琴, 李巍, 等. Westgard 西格玛多规则方 法在临床血液学检验常规项目质控中的应用[J]. 现 代检验医学杂志, 2018, 33(5): 151-154. CHENG Xiuli, WANG Qin, LI Wei, et al. Application of Westgard sigma rules in routine clinical hematology tests [J]. Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine, 2018, 33(5): 151-154.
[5]　叶圆圆, 王薇, 赵海建, 等. 我国2017 年常规生化检 验血液标本可接受性的现状调查[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2018, 36(6), 467-471. YE Yuanyuan, WANG Wei, ZHAO Haijian, et al. National survey of blood specimen acceptability for clinical chemistry test in 2017[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science, 2018, 36(6), 467-471.
[6]　王秋桐, 安洁. 检验标本中不合格的标本原因分析和 应对措施[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2014, 35(6): 776-778. WANG Qiutong, AN Jie. Analysis of the causes of unqualified specimens and countermeasures[J]. International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2014, 35(6): 776-778.
[7]　黄平, 马明炎, 余登琼. 血液检验标本不合格原因 分析及处理措施[J]. 重庆医学, 2017, 46(22): 3123- 3124. HUANG Ping, MA Mingyan, YU Dengqiong. Analysis of reasons for unqualified blood test specimens and treatment measures[J]. Chongqi Medicine, 2017, 46(22): 3123-3124.
[8]　文秀琼，青炜，胡贤蓉, 等. 血液分拣和贴标签模 式的探讨[J]．检验医学与临床, 2016, 13(7)：1004- 1005, 1008. WEN Xiuqiong, QING Wei, HU Xianrong, et al. Discussion on blood sorting and labeling model[J]. Laboratory Medicine and Clinic, 2016, 13(7): 1004-1005, 1008.
[9]　黎海生, 沈鑫, 杨悦林, 等. 临床检验标本相关5 项 质量指标的监测及应用分析[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2018, 39(7): 883-886. LI Haisheng, SHENG Xin, YANG Yuelin, et al. Monitoring and application analysis of 5 quality indexes related to clinical test specimens[J]. International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2018, 39(7): 883-886.

相似文献/References:

[1]费 阳,王 薇,王治国.医学检验质量指标:质量和患者安全的基本工具[J].现代检验医学杂志,2015,30(04):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.04.001]
　FEI Yang,WANG Wei,WANG Zhi-guo.Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine:A Fundamental Tool for Quality and Patient Safety[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2015,30(06):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.04.001]
[2]叶圆圆,王 薇,赵海建,等.中国临床实验室标本可接受性质量指标室间质量调查研究[J].现代检验医学杂志,2018,33(02):134.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2018.02.001]
　YE Yuan-yuan,WANG Wei,ZHAO Hai-jian,et al.External Quality Analysis of Quality Indicators on Specimen Acceptability[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2018,33(06):134.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2018.02.001]
[3]张 云,黄新强,高 兴,等.2017年解放军总医院第六医学中心急诊检验质量指标调查与分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2019,34(03):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2019.03.041]
　ZHANG Yun,HUANG Xin-qiang,GAO Xing,et al.Investigation and Analysis of Quality Index of Emergency Examinationin Chinese PLA General Hospital Sixth Medical Center in 2017[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2019,34(06):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2019.03.041]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：陕西省科技资源开放共享平台项目（No. 2018PT-24）。 作者简介：谢小娟（1981- ），女，副主任技师，主要从事检验医学室间质量评价工作，E-mail: xie198105@163.com。 通讯作者：郭华(1977- )，女，主管技师，主要从事临床检验工作，E-mail：guohua1123@163.com。收稿日期：2019-09-14
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-25