[1]孙晓冰,黄晓春,徐健,等.Celldiff BCM-2血细胞形态分析系统白细胞分类能力的初步验证和临床应用评价[J].现代检验医学杂志,2015,30(05):28-31.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.05.009]
　SUN Xiao-bing,HUANG Xiao-chun,X Jian,et al.Initial Verification and Clinical Evaluation of Celldiff BCM-2 Automated Analysis System for White Blood Cell Differentiation[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2015,30(05):28-31.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.05.009]
点击复制

Celldiff BCM-2血细胞形态分析系统白细胞分类能力的初步验证和临床应用评价()
分享到：

《现代检验医学杂志》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2015年05期
页码:
28-31
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2015-12-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Initial Verification and Clinical Evaluation of Celldiff BCM-2 Automated Analysis System for White Blood Cell Differentiation
作者:
孙晓冰; 黄晓春; 徐健; 孙懿; 周道银; 邓安梅; 郭杰
第二军医大学附属长海医院实验诊断科，上海200433
Author(s):
SUN Xiao-bing; HUANG Xiao-chun; X Jian; SUN Yi; ZHOU Dao-yin; DENG An-mei; GUO Jie
Department of Laboratory Diagnosis， Changhai Hospital，the Second Military Medical University，Shanghai 200433，China
关键词:
白细胞分类; 全自动血细胞图像分析; 实验室自动化; 性能评价
分类号:
R446
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2015.05.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的对celldiff BCM-2自动血细胞形态分析系统的白细胞分类计数进行性能验证及临床应用评估。方法celldiff分析仪及人工镜检分别对379例需显微镜复检的住院患者血涂片、46例健康体检者血涂片进行白细胞分类。通过celldiff预分类结果与审核后结果符合性分析，审核后结果与人工镜检结果相关性分析以及celldiff分析仪和人工镜检分类白细胞耗费时间比较评价该仪器对白细胞识别能力及其临床应用价值。结果住院患者标本Celldiff预分类中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、单核细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞、嗜碱性粒细胞和原始细胞结果符合率分别为97.28%，98.09%，76.81%，68.80%，47.49%和41.55%。健康体检标本分别为98.53%，95.40%，88.72%，81.89%，62.50%和0.00%。经线性回归分析，住院患者标本中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞仪器审核后结果与人工分类结果相关性较好(r=0.914，r=0.900)，嗜碱性粒细胞相关性较差(r=0.380)。健康体检标本相关系数较高。人工镜检平均耗时4.89 min/例，celldiff分析仪平均耗时3.20 min/例。2名检验者按日常工作流程分类计数80例患者标本，使用仪器平均耗时分别为2.89 min/例和2.50 min/例，人工镜检平均耗时分别为3.58 min/例和2.40min/例。结论Celldiff具有较好的临床应用价值，有利于实现白细胞分类的自动化与标准化。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo verify and evaluate the clinical performance of celldiff BCM-2 automated hematology analysis system for white blood cell differentiation．Methods379 blood smears of hospitalized patients which complied with the rules of microscope re-examination and 46 blood smears of healthy controls were analyzed by celldiff automatic hematology analyzer and manual microscope of leukocyte classification．Evaluated Accordance rate：pre-classification results carried out by celldiff vs final results by celldiff．Correlation coefficient：results by manual microscope vs final results by celldiff．Time Consuming Evaluation：making classification of 100 leukocytes，as well as mimic daily workflow with celldiff and manual microscope．ResultsThe classification accordance rate of neutrophilic granulocyte，lymphocyte，monocyte，eosinophils，basophils and blast of inpatients specimens were：97.28%，98.09%，76.81%，68.80%，47.49% and 41.55%，respectively．The classification accuracy of healthy specimens were：98.53%，95.40%，88.72%，81.89%，62.50% and 0.00%，respectively．The correlation coefficient of inpatient specimens of the results by celldiff and manual microscope：neutrophils 0.914，lymphocytes 0.900，while the lowest was eosinophils (0.380)．The correlation coefficient of healthy specimens were higher．The average time consuming by manual microscopy was 4.89 min/case，by celldiff was 3.20 min/case．2 staffs classified leukocytes of 80 inpatient specimens：the average time each smear took by celldiff were 2.89 min and 2.50 min，while by the manual microscope were 3.58 min and 2.40 min．ConclusionCelldiff has good clinical value and can improve the automatization and standardization of white blood cell differentiation．

参考文献/References:

［1］宋宝刚．临床检验中血细胞形态学检验的必要性研究［J］．中国继续医学教育，2013，5(4)：1-4． Song BG．Research on the necessity of blood cell morphological examination in clinical test［J］．China Continuing Medical Education，2013，5(4)：1-4．
[2]唐艺，白鸽，熊国干．血细胞形态学检查对血液系统疾病诊断的临床价值［J］．内科急危重症杂志，2008，14(5)：259-260． Tang Y，Bai G，Xiong GG．Clinical value of blood cell morphology detection in diagnosis of hematological diseases［J］．Journal of Internal Intersice Medicine，2008，14(5)：259-260．
[3]张迎明．血细胞形态学检查对疾病诊断的价值研究［J］．中外医疗，2015(3)：170-171． Zhang YM．Blood cell morphological examination research value on diagnosis of diseases［J］．China Foreign Medical Treatment，2015(3)：170-171．
[4]李明勇，李焱鑫，陈梅，等．血细胞分析仪白细胞分类计数量值溯源性的建立［J］．现代检验医学杂志，2011，26(6)：150-152． Li MY，Li YX，Chen M，et al．Measurement traceability establishment for leukocyte differential count of hematology analyzer［J］．J Mod Lab Med，2011，26(6)：150-152．
[5]段浩，陈锋，顾彪，等．血细胞分析技术及其研究进展［J］．医疗卫生装备，2014，35(5)：108-111． Duan H，Chen F，Gu B，et al．Study of hematology analysis technology and its development［J］．Chinese Medical Equipment Journal，2014，35(5)：108-111．
[6]王建中．外周血细胞形态学检验诊断的发展趋势［J］．中华检验医学杂志，2013，36(5)：389-392． Wang JZ．The future trend in laboratory diagnosis of peripheral blood cell morphology［J］．Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine，2013，36(5)：389-392．
[7]de Bitencourt ED，Voegeli CF，Santos Onzi GD，et al．Validation of the sysmex sp-1000i automated slide preparer-stainer in a clinical laboratory［J］．Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter，2013，35(6)：404-408．
[8]Cornbleet PJ．Clinical utility of the band count［J］．Clin Lab Med，2002，22(1)：101-136．

相似文献/References:

[1]朱传新,周玉平,何　艳,等.92 例新冠肺炎病毒感染患者早期外周血白细胞形态分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2020,35(03):94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2020.03.024]
　ZHU Chuan-xin,ZHOU Yu-ping,HE Yan,et al.Morphological Analysis of Early Peripheral Blood Leukocytes in 92 Patients with New Coronary Pneumonia[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2020,35(05):94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2020.03.024]
[2]周彩霞,张 驰,夏 涛.SYSMEX XN-350血液分析仪检测儿童全血样本白细胞分类和Q-Flag 标识准确性评估[J].现代检验医学杂志,2023,38(05):160.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2023.05.030]
　ZHOU Caixia,ZHANG Chi,XIA Tao.Evaluation of the Accuracy of White Blood Cell Classification and Q-Flag Identification of Pediatric Whole Blood Samples by SYSMEX XN-350 Hematology Analyzer[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2023,38(05):160.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2023.05.030]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：国家自然科学基金(81273282，81202353)，上海科委基金(11JC1410902)。 作者简介：孙晓冰(1985-)，男，学士，技师，主要从事血液形态学研究，E-mail：sunxiaobing1985@163.com。 通讯作者：郭杰，Tel：021-31162067，13621732375。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01