[1]张曙晴,张骆军.五种国产甘胆酸均相酶免疫法检测试剂的分析性能验证[J].现代检验医学杂志,2019,34(04):128-131.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2019.04.031]
　ZHANG Shu-qing,ZHANG Luo-jun.Performance Verification of Five Domestic Glycocholic Acid Reagents by Homogeneous Enzyme Immunoassay[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2019,34(04):128-131.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2019.04.031]
点击复制

五种国产甘胆酸均相酶免疫法检测试剂的分析性能验证()
分享到：

《现代检验医学杂志》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
第34卷
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
128-131
栏目:
研究简报·实验技术
出版日期:
2019-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Performance Verification of Five Domestic Glycocholic Acid Reagents by Homogeneous Enzyme Immunoassay
文章编号:
1671-7414(2019)03-128-04
作者:
张曙晴; 张骆军
(南通市第二人民医院检验科,江苏南通 226002)
Author(s):
ZHANG Shu-qing; ZHANG Luo-jun
(Department of Clinical Laboratory, the Second People's Hospital of Nantong,Jiangsu Nantong 226002,China)
关键词:
甘胆酸;  均相酶免疫法;  性能验证
分类号:
R446
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2019.04.031
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 对五种国产均相酶免疫法甘胆酸(CG)试剂进行分析性能验证,评价其临床应用价值。方法 在HITACHI7600全自动生化分析仪上对苏州博源(A)、安徽(B)、浙江(C)、重庆(D)和贵州(E)公司的CG试剂(标为A,B,C,D和E)进行性能验证,参考美国临床实验室标准化协会(CLSI)EP15-A,EP6-A和EP9-A2方案,对5种CG试剂的精密度、线性范围进行评价,并比对判定CG异常的一致率。结果 A～E试剂的批内变异系数(CV)分别为1.10%～5.23%,2.14%～5.73%,2.92%～8.74%,2.33%～8.23%和1.54%～3.70%,总CV分别为4.94%～7.02%,4.95%～6.90%,7.21%～18.75%,4.86%～11.32%和3.28%～5.90%。C试剂精密度大于试剂盒标注的不精密度。各试剂线性范围拟合方程斜率b分别为1.038,0.964,0.908,0.984和1.040,C试剂线性范围验证未通过。B～E试剂与A试剂结果比对,线性良好,相关系数(r2)为0.924～0.990,平均绝对偏倚分别为6.67%,36.3%,9.80%和16.45%,C,E试剂与A试剂结果不等效。CG异常一致率分别为90%(Kappa=0.80,P=0.000),82.5%(Kappa=0.65,P=0.000),82.5%(Kappa=0.65,P=0.000),90%(Kappa=0.75,P=0.000),B,E试剂与A试剂一致性优。结论 经过验证认为,不同厂家CG试剂各项性能略有不同,部分试剂参考范围有待进一步验证,建议选择适合自己实验室的CG试剂使用。
Abstract:
Objective To validate the analytical performance of five domestic glycocholic acid reagents by homogeneous enzyme immunoassay and evaluate their clinical application.Methods The performance of five glycocholic acid reagents(labeled as A,B,C,D and E)from Suzhou EVERMED Co.,Anhui B Co.,Zhejiang C Co.,Chongqing D Co.and Guizhou E Co.on HITACHI 7600 automatic biochemistry analyzer were assessed.According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute(CLSI)EP15-A,EP6-A and EP9-A2,the precision and linearity range were assessed.Compared five glycocholic acid reagents and determine the consistency of glycocholic acid abnormalities.Results The within-run coefficient of variation(CV)offive reagents(A～E)were 1.10%～5.23%,2.14%～5.73%,2.92%～8.74%,2.33%～8.23% and 1.54%～3.70% respectively.The total CV of reagents in A～Ewere 4.94%～7.02%,4.95%～6.90%,7.21%～18.75%,4.86%～11.32% and 3.28%～5.90% respectively.The precision of reagent C was higher than the stated.Slope b of fitting equation were 1.038,0.964,0.908,0.984 and 1.040,respectively,and the linear range verification of reagent C failed.In method comparison tests,the reagent B～E compared showed good linearities with reagent A,coefficient of correlation(r2)were 0.924～0.990,and the average absolute bias were 6.67%,36.3%,9.80% and 16.45%,respectively.Results of reagent C,E were not effective with reagent A.Agreement rates of the high glycocholic acid in reagent B～E and reagent A were 90%(Kappa=0.80,P=0.000),82.5%(Kappa=0.65,P=0.000),82.5%(Kappa=0.65,P=0.000)and 90%(Kappa=0.75,P=0.000),respectively.Reagent B,E had good consistency with reagent A.Conclusion The validation of different glycocholic acid reagents was different and the reference range should be further validated.So the laboratory should select suitable glycocholic acid reagent.

参考文献/References:

[1] ZHANG Aihua,SUN Hui,YAN Gangli,et al.Urinary metabolic profiling identifies a key role for glycocholic acid in human liver cancer by ultra-performance liquid-chromatography coupled with high-definition mass spectrometry[J].Clin Chim Acta,2013,418:86-90. [2] 康俊辉,谭辰琨,张建武.甘胆酸对慢性肝病的诊断意义[J].湖北中医药大学学报,2018,20(3):102-103. KANG Junhui,TAN Chenkun,ZHANG Jianwu.The significance of cholyglycine in the diagnosis of chronic liver disease[J].Journal of Hubei Universityof Chinese Medicine,2018,20(3):102-103. [3] 陆梦丽,吕礼应.均相酶免疫法检测甘胆酸的临床应用研究[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2017,27(17):2536-2538. LU Mengli,L(¨overU)Liying.Clinical research on the detection ofglycocholic acid by homogeneous enzyme immunoassay[J].Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology,2017,27(17):2536-2538. [4] 梁运来,廖经忠,王堃,等.均相酶免疫法与胶乳增强免疫比浊法检测甘胆酸的方法学比较[J].检验医学,2017,32(8):718-721. LIANG Yunlai,LIAO Jingzhong,WANG Kun,et al.Comparison of homogeneous enzyme immunoassay and latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay for the determination of cholyglycine[J].Laboratory Medicine,2017,32(8):718-721. [5] National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standar-ds.User demonstration of performance for precision and accuracy[S].Wayne:PA,NCCSL EP15-A,2001. [6] National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standar-ds.Evaluation of thelinearity of quantitative measurement procedures:a statistical approach[S].Wayne:PA,NCCSL.EP6-A,2003. [7] National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standar-ds.EP9-A2 Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples:approved guideline[S].Wayne:PA,NCCSL EP9-A2,2002. [8] 王微,虞留明,朱学源.甘胆酸检测在肝胆疾病临床诊断中的意义[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2014,8(15):77-81. WANG Wei,YU Liuming,ZHU Xueyuan.Diagnostic performance of the cholylglycine assay for liver and gall diseases[J].Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition),2014,8(15):77-81. [9] 朱文芳,韩双,邹爱民,等.血清TBA和CG检测在妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症早期诊断及围产儿不良结局影响的临床意义[J].现代检验医学杂志,2017,32(6):112-114. ZHU Wenfang,HAN Shuang,ZOU Aimin,et al.Cli-nical significance of detecting serum TBA and CG in early diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and perinatal adverse outcomes influence[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2017,32(6):112-114. [10] 于坤,张振东,阳双健.应用ROC曲线分析肝内胆汁淤积症孕妇血甘胆酸预测胎儿窘迫的最佳临界值[J].中国现代医学杂志,2015,25(1):78-80. YU Kun, ZHANG Zhendong, YANG Shuangjian.The best critical value of serum cholyglycine in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy(ICP)and its clinical significance in predicting the fetal distress[J].China Journal of Modern Medicine,2015,25(1):78-80. [11] 晏峰,周颖,任振唤.肠道恶性肿瘤患者甘胆酸水平与炎症变化过程的研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2015,25(18):4147-4149. YAN Feng,ZHOU Ying,REN Zhenhuan.Cholyglycine level of patients with intestinal malignant tumors and process of change of inflammations[J].Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology,2015,25(18):4147-4149.

相似文献/References:

[1]汪学耀,张涛,荆成宝.血清总胆汁酸与甘胆酸水平诊断妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症能力的Meta 分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2020,35(05):73.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2020.05.019]
　WANG Xue-yao,ZHANG Tao,JING Cheng-bao.Meta Analysis of the Ability of Total Bile Acid and Cholyglycine to Diagnose Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2020,35(04):73.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2020.05.019]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:张曙晴(1977-),女,本科,副主任技师,主要从事生化检验,E-mail:zhangshuqing9216@sina.com。 通讯作者:张骆军,男,副主任技师,E-mail:307968986@qq.com。收稿日期:2019-03-14 修回日期:2019-04-19
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-07-30