[1]孟 欣,王 刚,袁 莉,等.Sysmex血细胞分析仪白细胞分类计数校准方法的建立与验证[J].现代检验医学杂志,2016,31(01):101-103,107.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2016.01.029]
　MENG Xin,WANG Gang,YUAN Li,et al.Establishment of Method and Verification for Leukocyte Differential Count of Sysmex Hematology Analyzer[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2016,31(01):101-103,107.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2016.01.029]
点击复制

Sysmex血细胞分析仪白细胞分类计数校准方法的建立与验证()
分享到：

《现代检验医学杂志》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
第31卷
期数:
2016年01期
页码:
101-103,107
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2016-01-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Establishment of Method and Verification for Leukocyte Differential Count of Sysmex Hematology Analyzer
作者:
孟 欣1; 2; 王 刚1; 袁 莉1; 王 威1; 张宁1; 李 强2
1.西安交通大学第一附属医院检验科,西安 710061; 2.西安交通大学医学部,西安 710061
Author(s):
MENG Xin1; 2; WANG Gang1; YUAN Li1; WANG Wei1; ZHANG Ning1; LI Qiang2
1.Department of Clinical Laboratory,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061,China; 2.Medical College of Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710061,China
关键词:
血细胞分析仪;  白细胞分类计数;  校准
分类号:
R446.111
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2016.01.029
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 对Sysmex五分类血细胞分析仪白细胞分类计数进行校准,并通过仪器之间比对验证,使检测结果准确可靠。方法 采用手工显微镜计数法作为白细胞分类计数参考方法对5份新鲜全血白细胞分类计数百分比进行定值,用定值新鲜全血对Sysmex XE-2100,XS-800i和 XN-20(A1)血细胞分析仪的分类系数进行校准,之后用20份新鲜全血进行仪器间比对实验。结果 各仪器白细胞分类计数结果均在手工显微镜白细胞分类计数结果95%可信区间内。与参比仪器XE-2100相比,XS-800i NEUT%,LYM%,MON%,EOS%和BASO%相关系数r分别为0.99,0.99,0.98,0.98和0.59; XN-20(A1)NEUT%,LYM%,MON%,EOS%和BASO%相关系数r分别为0.99,0.99,0.97,0.98和0.55; XS-800i和XN-20(A1)白细胞分类计数NEUT%,LYM%,MON%和EOS%均100%在可信区间之内,XS-800i白细胞分类计数BASO%结果95%在可信区间之内,XN-20(A1)白细胞分类计数BASO%结果90%在可信区间之内。结论 该校准验证方案及比对结果满足WS/T 246-2005《白细胞分类计数参考方法》各项指标要求。为了保证血细胞分析仪白细胞分类计数结果的准确性以及不同实验室间白细胞分类计数的结果互认,要定期对仪器白细胞分类计数结果与手工显微镜分类计数结果进行比对分析。
Abstract:
Objective To calibrate the leukocyte differential counts and compare between all sysmex hematology analyzers,making the results accurate and reliable.Methods Used the manual visual microscope method as a reference method for leukocyte differential count to detect the fresh blood and then did assignment.The target value,calibrating the leukocyte differential counts of Sysmex XE-2100,XS-800i and XN-20(A1)with themanual value fresh blood,was calibrated and then compared hematology analyzers with another fresh blood.Results The leukocyte differential counts of all hematology analyzers were within the 95% confidence intervalof the manual visual microscope method.Comparing with the reference system,the correlation coefficient(r)of NEUT%,LYM%,MON%,EOS% and BASO% of XS-800i analyzer were 0.99,0.99,0.98,0.98 and 0.59,respectively.The correlation coefficient(r)of NEUT%,LYM%,MON%,EOS% and BASO% of XN-20(A1)analyzer were 0.99,0.99,0.97,0.98 and 0.55,respectively.XS-800i and XN-20(A1)NEUT%,LYM%,MON% and EOS% were within confidence interval 100%.XS-800iBASO% were within confidence interval 95%.XN-20(A1)BASO% were within confidence interval 90%.Conclusion This scheme could meet theWS/T 246-2005 demands.In order to ensure the accuracy and the results of mutual recognition of the leukocyte differential counts,the comparison analysis of the results of the manual visual microscope method and hematology analyzer were made.

参考文献/References:

[1] 廖 扬,张 蓉,石玉玲.两种血细胞分析系统测定结果的可比性研究[J].国际检验医学杂志,2013,34(10):1238-1239,1241. Liao Y,Zhang R,Shi YL.Comparison and bias estimation on the results produced by different hematology testing systems[J]. Int J Lab Med,2013,34(10):1238-1239,1241.
[2] R(¨overu)mke CL.The statistically expected variability in differentialleukocyte counting[M].Chicago:College of American Pathologists,1977:39-45.
[3] 李 强.五分类血液细胞分析仪白细胞分类参数的校准及验证[J].北方药学,2013,10(5):156. Li Q.The calibration and verification of the white blood count anddifferential by 5 differential hematology analyzer[J].Journal of North Pharmacy,2013,10(5):156.
[4] 谷小林,周文宾.校准血液分析仪保证检测结果准确-《血细胞分析的校准指南》标准解读[J].中国卫生标准管理,2012,3(1):26-29. Gu XL,Zhou WB.Calibration hematology analyzer guaranteeing the accuracy results-《Guideline for the calibration of blood cell assays》standard interpretation[J].China Health Standard Management,2012,3(1):26-29.
[5] 朱新勤,韩秀华,曾素根,等.五分类血液分析仪白细胞分类参数的校准及验证[J].现代预防医学,2009,36(19):3725-3726,3728. Zhu XQ,Han XH,Zeng SG,et al.The calibration and verification ofthe white blood count and differential by 5-differential hematology analyzer[J].Modern Preventive Medicine,2009,36(19):3725-3726,3728.
[6] 李明勇,李焱鑫,陈 梅,等.血细胞分析仪白细胞分类计数量值溯源性的建立[J].现代检验医学杂志,2011,26(6):150-152. Li MY,Li YX,Chen M,et al.Measurement traceability establishmentfor leukocyte differential count of hematology analyzer[J].J Mod Lab Med,2011,26(6):150-152.

相似文献/References:

[1]洪 俊,饶永彩.XN-9000血细胞分析仪筛查外周血中Sezary细胞的临床价值研究[J].现代检验医学杂志,2017,32(03):92.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2017.03.025]
　HONG Jun,RAO Yong-cai.Performance Evaluation of Alarms and Parameters Generated by Hematology Analyzer during Detection of Circulating Sezary Cells of Peripheral Blood Smears[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2017,32(01):92.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2017.03.025]
[2]张金彪,代荣琴.ISO 15189 医学实验室认可标准下血细胞分析仪故障修复后的检验质量验证[J].现代检验医学杂志,2020,35(05):168.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2020.05.043]
　ZHANG Jin-biao,DAI Rong-qin.Verification of Inspection Quality after Repair of Blood Cell Analyzer Failure by ISO 15189 Medical Laboratory Accreditation Standards[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2020,35(01):168.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2020.05.043]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:西安交通大学第一附属医院院基金项目(2013YK29)。 作者简介:孟 欣(1980-),女,硕士在读,主管检验师,从事临床血液学检验与研究,E-mail:468237221@qq.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-01-20